« Something to get depressed about | Main | Media gagged on Health Board report »
Ad strategy: attract complaints?
By Steven | February 27, 2008
Surely Hell Pizza is trying to make its ads offensive so that it can attract extra publicity by having complaints against them upheld. How else to explain its direct mail ad that says:
Hell Spicy BBQ Pork Spare Ribs are by all accounts a lot like having sex with Jenny Shipley – messy but good.
I’m guessing Hell knew the ad would be shot down, and eagerly anticipated the free media publicity (like this, perhaps?). Hey, extra bang for your advertising buck. So to speak.
Hell isn’t the first to twig to this tactic. But it does raise some questions about the advertising regulatory system. There’s no extra penalty for deliberately flouting the system, even if that could be proved. There’s no real way to stop the complaints system being used as leverage for extra publicity. And the ASA’s only remedy (having the ad withdrawn) only kicks in after the pamphlets have all been delivered. I doubt they were planning on using that ad again anyway.
Which raises an interesting general question: how many of the decisions upholding complaints against ads are delivered after the ad campaign is already over? If a company knows that its ad campaign will be finished before any complaint can be ruled on, and that the only penalty it can expect is to withdraw the ad that it is no longer using anyway… how much of an incentive does that company have to comply with advertising standards? And if the company wants to promote an image as edgy and daring, don’t the incentives work the other way?
I should point out that many of the ASCB’s upholds a lot of complaints on the grounds that they are misleading, and that’s hardly a reputation any company wants.
Topics: Advertising Standards | 52 Comments »
52 Responses to “Ad strategy: attract complaints?”
Comments
You must be logged in to post a comment.
February 28th, 2008 at 7:19 am
It’s a good tactic.
A number of film festivals have been doing it for years. I swear they send an advance programme to the community standards groups.
February 29th, 2008 at 9:40 am
Just theoretically — and without giving anyone any ideas — would Shipley have any legal avenues in this instance?
Is it okay as political satire or is she potentially defamed?
February 29th, 2008 at 9:49 am
Rob: I’m not quite sure about that one. Or at least, that strategy may have backfired. In at least one past film festival they were sweating on opening night about whether the Film and Literature Board of Review would restrain some of their key movies.
Other guy: It’s hard to see this being defamatory, and harder to see Jenny Shipley giving it currency by suing. What exactly is the sting? How would you rebut it? Her legal avenue is the Advertisting Standards Complaints Board.
May 23rd, 2020 at 11:54 am
… [Trackback]
[…] There you can find 34338 additional Info on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=70 […]
June 9th, 2020 at 9:21 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Information to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=70 […]
June 17th, 2020 at 2:02 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] There you can find 24059 additional Info to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=70 […]
June 23rd, 2020 at 3:32 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=70 […]
June 27th, 2020 at 1:47 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More Information here to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=70 […]
July 16th, 2020 at 7:18 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Information on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=70 […]
July 19th, 2020 at 10:37 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Information to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=70 […]
July 29th, 2020 at 3:50 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=70 […]
August 7th, 2020 at 4:31 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=70 […]
August 30th, 2020 at 6:01 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More Info here on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=70 […]
September 1st, 2020 at 1:13 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=70 […]
September 3rd, 2020 at 4:47 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=70 […]
September 20th, 2020 at 6:28 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More here to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=70 […]
September 23rd, 2020 at 4:21 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More here to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=70 […]
September 26th, 2020 at 4:03 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Here you can find 93860 more Info to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=70 […]
September 27th, 2020 at 11:39 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More here on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=70 […]
September 30th, 2020 at 2:24 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More here on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=70 […]
September 30th, 2020 at 8:44 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=70 […]
October 3rd, 2020 at 4:56 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] There you will find 32662 more Info to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=70 […]
October 10th, 2020 at 4:03 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=70 […]
October 24th, 2020 at 12:18 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More on to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=70 […]
November 11th, 2020 at 1:17 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Information to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=70 […]
November 13th, 2020 at 8:13 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Here you can find 11124 additional Information on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=70 […]
November 24th, 2020 at 2:32 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Info to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=70 […]
November 24th, 2020 at 5:38 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Info on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=70 […]
December 2nd, 2020 at 9:26 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More on on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=70 […]
December 10th, 2020 at 7:07 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More here to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=70 […]
December 18th, 2020 at 7:44 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Here you can find 6434 additional Information on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=70 […]
December 20th, 2020 at 6:53 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=70 […]
December 20th, 2020 at 7:41 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Information on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=70 […]
December 21st, 2020 at 1:47 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More Info here to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=70 […]
January 5th, 2021 at 1:04 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Here you will find 83870 more Info on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=70 […]
January 5th, 2021 at 1:25 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Here you can find 40233 additional Info on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=70 […]
January 6th, 2021 at 2:21 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Here you can find 93377 more Info to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=70 […]
January 7th, 2021 at 3:03 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=70 […]
January 14th, 2021 at 9:57 am
… [Trackback]
[…] There you can find 54743 more Information to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=70 […]
March 6th, 2021 at 1:10 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More on to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=70 […]
March 28th, 2021 at 12:15 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More here to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=70 […]
April 14th, 2021 at 2:06 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More Information here on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=70 […]
April 29th, 2021 at 5:36 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Info to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=70 […]
May 18th, 2021 at 7:25 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More Info here on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=70 […]
June 11th, 2021 at 4:27 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Info on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=70 […]
June 28th, 2021 at 2:30 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] There you will find 58790 more Info on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=70 […]
June 29th, 2021 at 2:12 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More Information here on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=70 […]
November 11th, 2021 at 2:10 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Info to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=70 […]
November 19th, 2021 at 2:43 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More Information here to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=70 […]
January 7th, 2022 at 8:54 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=70 […]
March 2nd, 2022 at 12:41 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More here on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=70 […]
April 9th, 2022 at 10:34 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More here on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=70 […]