« Budget leak: Nats’ behaviour “entirely appropriate”? | Main
A quick response to Matthew Hooton
By Steven | May 30, 2019
I see Matthew Hooton has noted that I have acted for Nicky Hager and accused me of hypocrisy for suggesting that National broke the law with its budget leaks.
He seems to think his logic is obvious. I guess it’s that Hager published confidential material leaked from the government (see especially: Other People’s Wars and The Hollow Men) and I didn’t accuse them of breach of confidence.
That can only be explained by the fact that I am a lefty, Labour-apologist lickspittle.
I thought my argument was clear from my blog post yesterday, but let me spell it out anyway:
Hager made unauthorised use of leaked confidential government material, and he had a defence of public interest.
National made unauthorised use of leaked confidential government material, and they didn’t have a defence of public interest because that same material was going to be made public two days later.
I explained why I thought there was no public interest, and even tried to spell out some arguments for National that I might be wrong.
Call that hypocrisy if you like, I suppose.
Topics: Breach of confidence | 25 Comments »



May 31st, 2020 at 7:29 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=723 […]
July 16th, 2020 at 1:41 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=723 […]
July 23rd, 2020 at 4:46 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Here you will find 77023 more Info on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=723 […]
July 27th, 2020 at 2:07 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] There you can find 16150 additional Info on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=723 […]
August 2nd, 2020 at 3:05 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=723 […]
August 20th, 2020 at 10:23 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=723 […]
August 29th, 2020 at 2:47 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=723 […]
September 2nd, 2020 at 8:50 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Information on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=723 […]
September 2nd, 2020 at 10:14 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More on to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=723 […]
September 3rd, 2020 at 12:47 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More Info here to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=723 […]
September 21st, 2020 at 3:33 am
… [Trackback]
[…] There you will find 86080 additional Info on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=723 […]
September 22nd, 2020 at 11:10 am
… [Trackback]
[…] There you can find 15879 additional Info to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=723 […]
September 24th, 2020 at 10:33 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Info to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=723 […]
September 29th, 2020 at 7:05 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More here on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=723 […]
October 15th, 2020 at 7:02 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Info to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=723 […]
November 4th, 2020 at 1:20 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=723 […]
November 8th, 2020 at 7:47 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=723 […]
November 21st, 2020 at 9:02 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Here you can find 90169 more Info to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=723 […]
November 27th, 2020 at 12:34 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=723 […]
December 10th, 2020 at 3:46 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] There you can find 57872 additional Information to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=723 […]
December 29th, 2020 at 12:29 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More Information here on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=723 […]
January 13th, 2021 at 2:15 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Here you can find 34774 more Info on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=723 […]
March 14th, 2021 at 11:08 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More on on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=723 […]
March 31st, 2021 at 10:38 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=723 […]
April 20th, 2021 at 9:45 am
… [Trackback]
[…] There you will find 75507 additional Info to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=723 […]