Archive for February, 2009« Previous Entries
Here’s a quirk in the Copyright Act that you may not be aware of: TV stations can use news photographs (even if they don’t have copyright) under the fair dealing defence, but newspapers can’t. I suppose this is because a broadcast or film is usually viewed fleetingly, so does not create a permanent record of […]
You may have noticed that I didn’t join the blackout in protest against section 92A.
It’s not that I don’t have concerns about the law. As you can see from the post below, it doesn’t seem to me that it’s been well thought through. I’m open to the idea that it goes too far.
But “guilt by […]
Our Bill of Rights vetting process has failed miserably again.
This is the system that’s supposed to pick up rights issues when a Bill is introduced to Parliament and consider whether the proposals are demonstrably justified. When a Bill affects free speech, officials are supposed to highlight the problem and ask questions like: “What’s the evidence […]
The Law Commmission has put out an issues paper on suppressing names and evidence. They’re seeking input, but you’d better be quick.
The paper sets out the various ways names and evidence can be suppressed, and asks whether reform is needed.
In general, they’re looking at recommending that the grounds on which suppression can be granted should be […]
I’m not a Christian. I think the Biblical creation story is daft. I don’t think it should be taught in schools. But I do think that when a serious radio programme debates the issue “Should creation be taught in schools?” the station should at least find someone who thinks it should to include in the […]
The UK’s Press Complaints Commission is looking into the ethics of The Sun’s story about a 13-year-old fathering a child. On what grounds, you ask? In NZ, the issue might be the child’s privacy (can a boy really consent to a story like that?) or whether the paper had “particular care and consideration for reporting […]
The Court of Appeal has thrown out the Bill of Rights challenge to the Electoral Finance Act. That’s not to say that they thought the EFA was consistent with the BORA. Just that they wouldn’t consider the issue.
I’m not too surprised that they threw out the challenge to the Attorney-General’s decision not to report to […]
The European Court of Human Rights has gone much further than NZ’s Hosking case in protecting children’s privacy. Parents of a newborn baby snapped by a private clinic in its sterile unit successfully argued that the taking (and keeping) of the photos (even without publication) without parental consent breached the child’s right to private life. This […]
Here’s one thing the prosecutors could have said to White about the Lundy case: Lundy filled his gas tank in Wellington. The fuel warning was flashing when he got back to Palmerston North. How did Lundy manage to empty the tank in one normal-speed trip back to Palmerston North plus a bit of driving in […]
I commend to your attention Mike White’s terrific article questioning the conviction of Mark Lundy in North & South magazine.
It seems Lundy is to be added to New Zealand’s increasingly large stack of questionable convictions.
When serious questions like this arise, I don’t think it’s enough for police and prosecutors to respond, as they often do, by saying “the […]