« Christians vs South Park: the sequel | Main | Has John Edwards ripped off Coldplay’s “Clocks” too? »
Journalist sacked for swearing at boss
By Steven | December 14, 2007
The Employment Relations Authority has upheld the Press’s sacking of sports journalist John Coffey. Sports editor Coen Lammers had added in some words to one of his cricket stories. The words were “New Zealand’s youngest in a decade”. In fact, the phrase should have been “New Zealand’s youngest in over half a century”.
When he saw the change (incidentally, before the paper was put to bed), Mr Coffey was not best pleased. He said something like: “leave my fucking copy alone” and “you always fuck it up” and “don’t feel too bad about it because they (pointing at the editors’ office) also fuck things up.”
This needs to be said: there is no rage quite like the rage one feels when someone fucks with one’s copy.
(This also needs to be said: there is no gratitude quite like the gratitude one feels for someone who corrects one’s embarrassing cock-up before it goes to print).
Is this really a sacking offence? We’re talking about a newsroom here. We’re talking about a sports journo. There are newsrooms where nobody thinks you’re serious about something unless you use the F-word.
The rest of the ERA’s decision makes it clear that there’s more to the firing than one outburst. Coffey had twice been formally warned about offensive and confrontational behaviour in the preceeding months: once for threatening to “wring the fucking neck” of a subeditor, and once for calling Lammers “a fucking idiot”. The first warning came with an offer of confidential counselling which he didn’t take up. The second warning said Coffey may be dismissed if it happened again. The editor gave him a full opportunity to explain himself, but in the end wasn’t satisfied, and fired him. No doubt, beneath the narrative of the legally salient facts, there’s a more complex undercurrent of relationships going sour.
I’m not an employment law expert, but the firing strikes me as harsh but not outside the law.
Amusingly, the NZ Herald’s report of the case mixes up the botched phrase added to Coffey’s story with the phrase that ought to have been added. No doubt some fucking idiot of an editor screwed with the copy.
Topics: General, journalist employment issues | 48 Comments »
48 Responses to “Journalist sacked for swearing at boss”
Comments
You must be logged in to post a comment.
May 21st, 2020 at 1:12 am
… [Trackback]
[…] There you will find 3413 more Info on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=36 […]
July 14th, 2020 at 6:31 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=36 […]
July 17th, 2020 at 7:24 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More on to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=36 […]
August 31st, 2020 at 1:37 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Info on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=36 […]
September 2nd, 2020 at 8:20 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More here to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=36 […]
September 10th, 2020 at 2:24 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Information to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=36 […]
September 22nd, 2020 at 6:35 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=36 […]
September 24th, 2020 at 7:52 am
… [Trackback]
[…] There you will find 63322 more Info to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=36 […]
September 25th, 2020 at 11:32 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More Information here on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=36 […]
September 30th, 2020 at 4:54 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Information on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=36 […]
October 22nd, 2020 at 11:19 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More here on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=36 […]
November 16th, 2020 at 1:15 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More on to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=36 […]
November 28th, 2020 at 6:04 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Information to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=36 […]
November 28th, 2020 at 11:01 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More on to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=36 […]
December 5th, 2020 at 2:35 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More Info here on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=36 […]
December 9th, 2020 at 8:03 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Info to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=36 […]
December 23rd, 2020 at 12:46 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More Info here on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=36 […]
December 27th, 2020 at 7:40 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Info to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=36 […]
December 28th, 2020 at 9:25 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More here on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=36 […]
January 23rd, 2021 at 2:51 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More here on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=36 […]
February 14th, 2021 at 1:45 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More Info here on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=36 […]
March 28th, 2021 at 5:58 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Here you can find 39013 more Info to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=36 […]
April 23rd, 2021 at 3:39 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More on on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=36 […]
May 6th, 2021 at 11:27 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Information on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=36 […]
May 19th, 2021 at 10:15 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Here you can find 33990 additional Info on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=36 […]
June 3rd, 2021 at 8:25 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More Info here on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=36 […]
June 14th, 2021 at 8:22 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Here you can find 22427 additional Info to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=36 […]
June 26th, 2021 at 1:12 am
… [Trackback]
[…] There you can find 93033 additional Information on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=36 […]
June 27th, 2021 at 2:28 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Information on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=36 […]
July 2nd, 2021 at 3:30 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More here to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=36 […]
July 4th, 2021 at 1:45 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More here on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=36 […]
July 23rd, 2021 at 6:48 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More here to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=36 […]
September 30th, 2021 at 5:55 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Info to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=36 […]
October 14th, 2021 at 2:23 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More Info here to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=36 […]
October 19th, 2021 at 5:01 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More here on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=36 […]
October 25th, 2021 at 1:06 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More here on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=36 […]
November 25th, 2021 at 3:02 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More Information here on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=36 […]
November 27th, 2021 at 2:31 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More here to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=36 […]
December 11th, 2021 at 7:45 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Here you can find 4868 additional Information on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=36 […]
December 18th, 2021 at 1:12 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More on on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=36 […]
December 21st, 2021 at 3:19 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More on on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=36 […]
January 9th, 2022 at 8:23 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=36 […]
February 8th, 2022 at 12:15 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Here you will find 21241 more Info on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=36 […]
March 4th, 2022 at 12:24 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More on on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=36 […]
April 20th, 2022 at 4:40 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=36 […]
April 26th, 2022 at 1:10 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More here on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=36 […]
June 20th, 2022 at 2:18 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Info on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=36 […]
June 30th, 2022 at 9:15 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=36 […]