Steven Price

My book

Media Minefield


Guide to NZ Media Law

Official Information Act

Official Information Act


Bill of Rights Act

Media law resources

Feeds (RSS)


« | Main | »

Illegal exclusion of media?

By Steven | February 29, 2008

Yesterday, Justice Panckhurst closed the court to the media in a preliminary hearing on the Bain case. He is reported as saying that discussions were sensitive and could have implications for a fair trial. But these are not grounds for excluding the media. Check out section 138 of the Criminal Justice Act:

138 Power to clear court and forbid report of proceedings

(1) Subject to the provisions of subsections (2) and (3) of this section and of any other enactment, every sitting of any court dealing with any proceedings in respect of an offence shall be open to the public.

(2) Where a court is of the opinion that the interests of justice, or of public morality, or of the reputation of any victim of any alleged sexual offence or offence of extortion, or of the security or defence of New Zealand so require, it may make any one or more of the following orders:

(a) An order forbidding publication of any report or account of the whole or any part of —

(i) The evidence adduced; or

(ii) The submissions made:  

(b) An order forbidding the publication of the name of any witness or witnesses, or any name or particulars likely to lead to the identification of the witness or witnesses:

(c) Subject to subsection (3) of this section, an order excluding all or any persons other than the informant, any member of the Police, the defendant, any counsel engaged in the proceedings, and any officer of the court from the whole or any part of the proceedings.

(3) The power conferred by paragraph (c) of subsection (2) of this section shall not, except where the interests of security or defence so require, be exercised so as to exclude any accredited news media reporter.

(4) An order made under paragraph (a) or paragraph (b) of subsection (2) of this section—

(a) May be made for a limited period or permanently; and

(b) If it is made for a limited period, may be renewed for a further period or periods by the court; and

(c) If it is made permanently, may be reviewed by the court at any time.

(5) The powers conferred by this section to make orders of any kind described in subsection (2) of this section are in substitution for any such powers that a court may have had under any inherent jurisdiction or any rule of law; and no court shall have power to make any order of any such kind except in accordance with this section or any other enactment.

Upshot: even if the court is closed, the media is allowed to stay, unless national defence or security is at stake. Here, it’s not. The proper course is to make suppression orders, not exclude the media. Note that under subsection (5) any inherent power the court might have in the background is extinguished. Still, I understand that some judges do go into chambers and exclude the media for preliminary hearings in criminal cases. As far as I know, the question of whether judges retain some residual power to do this, perhaps on the grounds that a chambers hearing is not a “sitting” of court, has not been tested. I’m inclined to think that such a power would be inconsistent with section 138, which seems very widely drafted.

Topics: Suppression orders | 52 Comments »

52 Responses to “Illegal exclusion of media?”

  1. Graeme Edgeler Says:
    February 29th, 2008 at 12:33 pm

    I assume there’s actually a process for news media reporters to become accredited? Were these particular reporters so-accredited?

  2. Steven Says:
    February 29th, 2008 at 12:37 pm

    As far as I know, the concept of “accredited journalist” has never been properly clarified (see also Burrows and Cheer, Media Law in NZ, 330, who don’t think so either). In particular, it’s not clear whether freelance journalists are included. Serious bloggers are probably in the same camp. A lot is left to the discretion of the courts.

  3. christopher mitson Says:
    February 29th, 2008 at 1:04 pm

    What determines whether a pre-trial hearing is heard in court or in a judge’s chambers? (Have I been reading too many American legal thrillers?). Is there anything to prevent the judge closing a hearing in open court and then reconvening in chambers?

  4. poneke1 Says:
    February 29th, 2008 at 1:19 pm

    I’ve attended many an in-chambers hearing in my time, at several of them standing up in the court to insist to the judge my right to be there, even if the public is excluded. The judges have always agreed.

    What I suspect may have happened in Christchurch is that Panckhurst J may be mindful that the media have taken it upon themselves to be the cheerleaders in the Bain case, to such an extraordinary degree that matters discussed in chambers may not stay there.

  5. Anne Hunt Says:
    March 16th, 2008 at 10:33 am

    As the author of the banned book Broken Silence, I had to contend with ten interlocutory hearings in closed Chambers. I am surprised that the respondent to my appeal, quoted in a memorandum to the Court of Appeal, a statement I’d made in a submission to the High Court: “It is my belief that it is not the role of a Judge to persist with questions in order to pressure the defendant into making a statement which the defendant knows to be untrue.”
    Furthermore, in closed Chambers the High Court Judge cited the hearsay rule to deter me from introducing crucial evidence by claiming I could not do so unless I called Dr David Collins QC as a witness. The Court of Appeal stated that: “We think the Judge was inadvertently drawn into error on the ruling he gave in this instance.”
    In other words, when pre-trial hearings are held in closed Chambers, there are risks that the principles of natural justice will not be upheld or that evidence is withheld due to directions given in closed Chambers.
    In terms of the Bain case, I believe it is crucial that all pre-trial hearings be heard in open sittings to ensure all proceedings relating to this contentious litigation is fair.
    After all, David Bain is entitled to ensure the Judges do not try to defend the previous conviction.

  6. Habe es hier gekauft Says:
    May 20th, 2020 at 7:55 am

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More Information here on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=72 […]

  7. 아로마마사지 Says:
    May 25th, 2020 at 4:18 am

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More Information here on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=72 […]

  8. market research companies Toronto Says:
    June 3rd, 2020 at 7:09 pm

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More on on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=72 […]

  9. gran polla Says:
    June 17th, 2020 at 5:38 am

    … [Trackback]

    […] Here you can find 84612 additional Info to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=72 […]

  10. https://ruaylotvip.com/ Says:
    July 17th, 2020 at 12:31 pm

    … [Trackback]

    […] There you will find 31581 additional Information on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=72 […]

  11. iphone vpn Says:
    August 2nd, 2020 at 3:55 am

    … [Trackback]

    […] Information on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=72 […]

  12. medical marijuana for sale Says:
    August 4th, 2020 at 1:11 pm

    … [Trackback]

    […] Information on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=72 […]

  13. เพื่อนแท้เงินด่วน Says:
    August 5th, 2020 at 5:17 pm

    … [Trackback]

    […] Info on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=72 […]

  14. tutors Says:
    August 20th, 2020 at 1:13 pm

    … [Trackback]

    […] There you will find 20235 more Info to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=72 […]

  15. huong dan 188bet Says:
    September 1st, 2020 at 8:11 am

    … [Trackback]

    […] Information to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=72 […]

  16. http://63.250.38.81 Says:
    September 2nd, 2020 at 11:49 am

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More on to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=72 […]

  17. wigs Says:
    September 2nd, 2020 at 7:31 pm

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More Information here to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=72 […]

  18. linkw88moinhat.com Says:
    September 4th, 2020 at 11:11 am

    … [Trackback]

    […] Info on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=72 […]

  19. pinewswire Says:
    September 23rd, 2020 at 1:04 pm

    … [Trackback]

    […] Information to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=72 […]

  20. click for more Says:
    September 25th, 2020 at 4:24 am

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More Information here on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=72 […]

  21. bitcoin loophole Says:
    September 30th, 2020 at 5:31 am

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More on to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=72 […]

  22. bitcoin era online Says:
    October 3rd, 2020 at 5:55 pm

    … [Trackback]

    […] Here you can find 31254 more Info to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=72 […]

  23. porn movie Says:
    October 19th, 2020 at 8:23 am

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More Information here to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=72 […]

  24. 안전놀이터 Says:
    October 20th, 2020 at 1:43 pm

    … [Trackback]

    […] Here you can find 30290 additional Information to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=72 […]

  25. ตู้แปลภาษา Says:
    October 25th, 2020 at 3:46 am

    … [Trackback]

    […] Here you will find 16885 additional Information on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=72 […]

  26. Sicherheitsdienst Says:
    November 27th, 2020 at 3:38 am

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More Information here to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=72 […]

  27. cvv dumps Says:
    November 27th, 2020 at 11:58 pm

    … [Trackback]

    […] Information to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=72 […]

  28. Engineering Says:
    December 29th, 2020 at 9:01 pm

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More Info here to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=72 […]

  29. Kampala International University Says:
    December 31st, 2020 at 6:25 pm

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More Info here to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=72 […]

  30. click here Says:
    January 4th, 2021 at 6:03 pm

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More Information here on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=72 […]

  31. cách tỏ tình lãng mạn Says:
    January 6th, 2021 at 2:31 pm

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More on to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=72 […]

  32. người yêu cũ muốn quay lại Says:
    January 6th, 2021 at 4:22 pm

    … [Trackback]

    […] There you will find 313 additional Info to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=72 […]

  33. Get More Information Says:
    January 14th, 2021 at 9:00 pm

    … [Trackback]

    […] Info on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=72 […]

  34. sell car australia Says:
    January 16th, 2021 at 6:40 am

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More Info here on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=72 […]

  35. Regression Testing Says:
    January 19th, 2021 at 4:51 pm

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More on on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=72 […]

  36. wigs for women Says:
    January 24th, 2021 at 4:45 pm

    … [Trackback]

    […] Info to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=72 […]

  37. Digital Transformation Solutions Says:
    February 4th, 2021 at 7:57 am

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More on on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=72 […]

  38. 원샷홀덤 Says:
    March 30th, 2021 at 5:46 am

    … [Trackback]

    […] Info to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=72 […]

  39. 메이저토토 Says:
    April 1st, 2021 at 4:32 pm

    … [Trackback]

    […] There you can find 20641 more Info to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=72 […]

  40. 주소모아 Says:
    April 7th, 2021 at 5:23 am

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More here to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=72 […]

  41. dewa jitu Says:
    April 12th, 2021 at 11:08 pm

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More on on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=72 […]

  42. 오밤 Says:
    April 29th, 2021 at 12:00 am

    … [Trackback]

    […] Info to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=72 […]

  43. Handyman service near me Says:
    May 4th, 2021 at 4:23 am

    … [Trackback]

    […] Here you can find 5931 additional Information on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=72 […]

  44. ดูบอล Says:
    May 4th, 2021 at 11:33 am

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=72 […]

  45. http://www.katawatches.com/ Says:
    May 29th, 2021 at 8:36 pm

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More on to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=72 […]

  46. 사설토토 Says:
    June 21st, 2021 at 2:22 am

    … [Trackback]

    […] Info on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=72 […]

  47. microsoft exchange mail Says:
    June 27th, 2021 at 2:58 pm

    … [Trackback]

    […] Information to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=72 […]

  48. lenovo sunucu destek Says:
    July 3rd, 2021 at 7:50 pm

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More Information here to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=72 […]

  49. azure DevOps consulting services Says:
    July 4th, 2021 at 1:46 pm

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More on on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=72 […]

  50. cvv Says:
    July 30th, 2021 at 6:11 am

    … [Trackback]

    […] Here you can find 89071 more Info to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=72 […]

  51. https://forums.softraid.com/profile/lily_aurora/ Says:
    August 31st, 2021 at 11:15 am

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More here on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=72 […]

  52. French Bulldogs for sale Says:
    September 29th, 2021 at 6:48 pm

    … [Trackback]

    […] There you can find 80749 more Info on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=72 […]

Comments

You must be logged in to post a comment.