« Come on NZ Herald, make a clean breast of it | Main | The operative word »
Fifty shades unrestricted
By Steven | September 27, 2012
The censor’s office has classified the international blockbusting romantic erotic novel, Fifty Shades of Grey, as unrestricted. That means, essentially, they’re saying that its availability is not injurious to the public good.
I think it’s a sensible and thoughtful decision. But then, I would: Random House engaged me to write the submissions for them.
Books like this pose a challenge for censors. They certainly deal with one of the gateways for the censor’s powers: “matters such as sex“. And how. There is quite a lot of sex, and it’s quite explicit. The book deals with BDSM. Should it be restricted?
The censor finds that there’s not really any need to. (Which is a bit lucky, since the series has sold 350,000 copies here, and it’s been voted Number 5 in Whitcoulls’ top 100 list for 2012-2013).
The censor’s decision notes that there is no force or compulsion in the book; it’s spicy, but consensual and respectful. It’s not likely to attract the interest of children. It has won mainstream acceptance. It has opened up a taboo area in a healthy way: in the censor’s words, it has “allowed women to talk about sex in a socially permissible manner”. There’s really no evidence that the 40 million copies that are out in the world at the moment have done anyone any harm. As far as I can tell, no other comparable government has censored it. There has only been one complaint about it in NZ.
For what it’s worth, I think it’s not the sex that sells this book, at least not by itself. If this was just a porn film on paper, it wouldn’t shift 40 million copies. It’s the love story that makes it resonate with the readers. Okay, that and the sex.
Topics: Censorship | 50 Comments »
50 Responses to “Fifty shades unrestricted”
Comments
You must be logged in to post a comment.
September 27th, 2012 at 2:17 pm
This is something I fundamentally object to.
It’s a book, as in text. Nobody was hurt in making it, nobody was coerced. Most other liberal jurisdictions recognise and don’t (de jure or de facto) censor text. (The last such case in the UK was 1992, with an initial conviction by a magistrate overturned on appeal).
September 28th, 2012 at 12:55 am
But, in the words of one of your distinguished legal colleagues, is it the sort of book one would wish one’s wife or servants to read?
June 19th, 2020 at 12:05 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More Info here to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=575 […]
June 25th, 2020 at 10:31 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=575 […]
June 26th, 2020 at 4:00 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More Information here on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=575 […]
July 22nd, 2020 at 12:03 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=575 […]
July 24th, 2020 at 5:06 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Here you will find 67547 more Information on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=575 […]
July 27th, 2020 at 5:23 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=575 […]
July 29th, 2020 at 1:41 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] There you can find 5878 more Info on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=575 […]
August 7th, 2020 at 3:07 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More Info here on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=575 […]
August 8th, 2020 at 12:15 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More Information here to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=575 […]
August 23rd, 2020 at 4:35 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=575 […]
August 25th, 2020 at 1:19 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More Info here to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=575 […]
September 3rd, 2020 at 2:43 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Info to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=575 […]
September 4th, 2020 at 10:12 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=575 […]
September 9th, 2020 at 1:27 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Info on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=575 […]
September 19th, 2020 at 8:57 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=575 […]
September 22nd, 2020 at 1:16 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More on to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=575 […]
September 23rd, 2020 at 9:27 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=575 […]
October 30th, 2020 at 2:31 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=575 […]
November 4th, 2020 at 2:56 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Info on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=575 […]
November 5th, 2020 at 2:18 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] There you will find 58505 additional Info on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=575 […]
November 5th, 2020 at 3:54 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Information to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=575 […]
November 11th, 2020 at 12:27 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More here on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=575 […]
November 15th, 2020 at 9:23 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More Info here to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=575 […]
November 28th, 2020 at 7:32 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=575 […]
December 6th, 2020 at 1:53 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Information to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=575 […]
December 9th, 2020 at 12:47 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More Information here to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=575 […]
December 30th, 2020 at 7:47 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More Info here to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=575 […]
January 21st, 2021 at 11:42 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Info to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=575 […]
January 22nd, 2021 at 4:56 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Info to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=575 […]
January 24th, 2021 at 9:29 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=575 […]
February 7th, 2021 at 7:25 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=575 […]
March 20th, 2021 at 7:43 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Info on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=575 […]
April 28th, 2021 at 10:17 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More Information here on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=575 […]
April 30th, 2021 at 1:54 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More here to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=575 […]
May 21st, 2021 at 8:11 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Information on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=575 […]
May 25th, 2021 at 3:10 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More here to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=575 […]
June 23rd, 2021 at 5:14 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Info on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=575 […]
June 28th, 2021 at 6:37 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More on to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=575 […]
June 29th, 2021 at 11:22 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More here on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=575 […]
July 3rd, 2021 at 7:20 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More on to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=575 […]
July 18th, 2021 at 7:28 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More Info here to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=575 […]
August 6th, 2021 at 11:59 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More here to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=575 […]
September 8th, 2021 at 1:04 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Information to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=575 […]
October 2nd, 2021 at 11:02 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=575 […]
October 20th, 2021 at 10:00 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Information on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=575 […]
October 31st, 2021 at 4:46 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Here you will find 2247 additional Information on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=575 […]
November 9th, 2021 at 11:10 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=575 […]
November 13th, 2021 at 6:25 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=575 […]