« How to door-step someone | Main | Law Commission’s new media paper »
Should the Treasury asset-sales advice have been released?
By Steven | November 29, 2011
The Chief Ombudsman Beverley Wakem says no. OIA expert John Edwards isn’t so sure. He provides a thorough and thoughtful analysis of her decision here.
Under the OIA, you’re entitled to see almost any information held by the government just by asking for it. To withhold information, the government must point to one of the specific exceptions in the Act (which are about personal privacy, commercial prejudice, damage to the policy-making process and the like) and explain (a) how the release of the information would cause harm to that interest and (b) why the public interest in the disclosure of the information doesn’t outweigh that harm.
As John explains, the government here has pointed to the very nebulous exceptions that protect policy advice. It is easy for the government to make assertions about the evils that will befall us if advice is released prematurely. My impression is that the Ombudsmen are sometimes too ready to accept those assertions. John gives us reasons to doubt the validity of the reasons the government gave here – the reasons that were accepted by the Ombudsmen’s office.
But there is one part of the Ombudsmen’s decision that gives me some comfort:
Whilst there is an exceptionally strong public interest in disclosure of information that may help voters to decide how to exercise their vote, I am not persuaded that the specific information concerned in this case would provide such assistance.
The Chief Ombudsmen was certainly alive to the democratic importance of relevant political information. But she says here, essentially, that there’s not much in this Treasury advice that’s of relevance to the election. If she’s right, then all the criticism her decision has attracted may be unfair (though you could be forgiven for wondering why the government is so keen to withhold it). In a different election cycle, this might have been the storm in a teacup.
As John points out, we will get to see the Treasury advice one day, though of course it’s too late for the election. Then we’ll be able to make up our own minds about its significance and properly evaluate the Chief Ombudsman’s decision…
Topics: Official Information Act | 49 Comments »
49 Responses to “Should the Treasury asset-sales advice have been released?”
Comments
You must be logged in to post a comment.
November 30th, 2011 at 10:20 am
The thing I found interesting about the issue was that Russel Norman appears to have very little respect for public servants.
May 22nd, 2020 at 11:52 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Here you can find 52642 additional Information to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=532 […]
June 23rd, 2020 at 8:32 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Here you can find 3666 additional Information on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=532 […]
July 24th, 2020 at 4:20 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Info to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=532 […]
July 29th, 2020 at 11:33 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=532 […]
August 6th, 2020 at 6:43 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More here on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=532 […]
August 18th, 2020 at 11:21 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=532 […]
August 21st, 2020 at 10:45 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Information to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=532 […]
August 30th, 2020 at 8:38 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=532 […]
September 4th, 2020 at 6:06 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More Information here to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=532 […]
September 4th, 2020 at 8:58 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Info to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=532 […]
September 8th, 2020 at 2:57 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More here to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=532 […]
October 3rd, 2020 at 3:56 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=532 […]
October 14th, 2020 at 11:42 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=532 […]
October 30th, 2020 at 5:37 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=532 […]
November 10th, 2020 at 1:12 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Here you can find 59571 more Information to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=532 […]
December 7th, 2020 at 6:51 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=532 […]
December 9th, 2020 at 5:37 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More on to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=532 […]
December 17th, 2020 at 11:45 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=532 […]
December 21st, 2020 at 3:03 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Info on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=532 […]
January 8th, 2021 at 2:15 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Information on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=532 […]
January 16th, 2021 at 2:41 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More on on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=532 […]
January 18th, 2021 at 10:24 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More Info here on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=532 […]
January 19th, 2021 at 2:58 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More Information here to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=532 […]
February 11th, 2021 at 10:55 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=532 […]
February 13th, 2021 at 1:32 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Information on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=532 […]
March 20th, 2021 at 12:24 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=532 […]
April 15th, 2021 at 11:22 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=532 […]
May 15th, 2021 at 6:23 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Information to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=532 […]
June 7th, 2021 at 12:27 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Info on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=532 […]
June 18th, 2021 at 6:18 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Here you can find 68707 more Information to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=532 […]
June 22nd, 2021 at 1:41 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More here to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=532 […]
June 28th, 2021 at 5:58 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More here to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=532 […]
June 29th, 2021 at 4:46 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More Information here on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=532 […]
July 30th, 2021 at 3:07 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More Information here on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=532 […]
October 30th, 2021 at 7:46 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Info to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=532 […]
October 31st, 2021 at 3:34 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Here you will find 88630 more Information on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=532 […]
December 5th, 2021 at 1:17 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More on to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=532 […]
December 9th, 2021 at 9:50 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Information on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=532 […]
December 21st, 2021 at 3:50 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Here you can find 70119 additional Information to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=532 […]
January 8th, 2022 at 2:28 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More Information here to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=532 […]
January 10th, 2022 at 12:41 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Information to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=532 […]
January 18th, 2022 at 1:04 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=532 […]
March 3rd, 2022 at 2:31 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=532 […]
March 12th, 2022 at 3:19 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Info on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=532 […]
April 20th, 2022 at 9:36 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Info to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=532 […]
June 23rd, 2022 at 3:23 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More here on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=532 […]
June 25th, 2022 at 8:23 am
… [Trackback]
[…] There you can find 71266 additional Info on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=532 […]
June 28th, 2022 at 3:33 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More here to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=532 […]