Steven Price

My book

Media Minefield


Guide to NZ Media Law

Official Information Act

Official Information Act


Bill of Rights Act

Media law resources

Feeds (RSS)


« | Main | »

The case against Michael Reed

By Steven | July 9, 2010

Michael Reed QC, Morning Report on Wednesday:

The jury were completely convinced that David hadn’t done it.

This betrays either a gob-smacking ignorance of fundamental principles of criminal law, or an intention to mislead the public about the significance of a not-guilty verdict.

Fortunately, one of the Bain jurors seems to understand the law better than Reed, as demonstrated in this letter to the Christchurch Press last month:

As a member of David Bain’s retrial jury, I am angered by the misinterpretation of our not-guilty verdict by the public, and particularly by the media. In an article in The New Zealand Herald, shortly after the retrial verdict last June, Paul Holmes wrote: ‘‘David Bain is innocent. Robin Bain came in from the caravan that cold Monday morning and killed four sleeping members of his family, then himself.’’

This type of conclusion has been repeated many times in the year since the trial finished. Even in Friday’s Press article about an upcoming play about the murder case, Katie Chapman states that Bain’s ‘‘defence successfully argued that Robin was the killer’’. I take exception to this flawed characterisation of David Bain’s not-guilty verdict. As a jury, we did not necessarily find David innocent or Robin guilty. Our task was to determine if David Bain’s guilt was proved beyond reasonable doubt – a very high threshold. Anyone who reads from our verdict that Robin Bain is guilty is just plain wrong. Robin Bain was not on trial – David was.

Good on RNZ’s Monique Devereux for making this point.

Incidentally, this also rather suggests that there are occasions on which it is valuable to hear from jurors after a verdict, despite the hard line taken on this issue by many judges.

Topics: General | 9 Comments »

9 Responses to “The case against Michael Reed”

  1. justin Says:
    July 9th, 2010 at 4:41 pm

    It all serves to highlight more of the fictions the law sometimes uses to support itself.

    At common law, the ‘golden thread’ was a presumption of innocence, rebuttable on proof of reasonable doubt. Absent proof to that standard, the presumption of innocence remained. On that basis, David is innocent ‘at law’.

    On the other hand, the BORA presumption of innocence is in relation to ‘the determination of the charge’ only. On that basis, now that the charge has been determined, David can no longer avail himself of the presumption of innocence and questions of ‘innocence’ remain to be determined if and when they arise.

    An obvious but illuminating point is that if Robin Bain had survived his injury and been put on trial, he too would likely have been able to show a reasonable doubt and therefore secure an acquittal as well.

    Karam v Justice For Robin Bain promise to be a very interesting case if it reaches trial (not least of all for it ironic name).

    ‘M’lud, in the case of Karam against Justice for Robin Bain…’:)

  2. Media law expert Steven Price comments on the Robin Bain TV doco « Whitireia Journalism School Says:
    July 9th, 2010 at 7:58 pm

    […] Price’s comments on the Robin Bain TV documentary screened this week on TV1 HERE> and HERE> 0.000000 […]

  3. DMPK Says:
    October 2nd, 2017 at 8:56 am

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More on|Find More|Read More Infos here|Here you will find 13139 more Infos|Informations to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=383 […]

  4. adme services Says:
    October 7th, 2017 at 1:02 am

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More here|Find More|Find More Infos here|Here you can find 65840 additional Infos|Informations on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=383 […]

  5. engineering Says:
    November 9th, 2017 at 11:30 am

    … [Trackback]

    […] Find More here|Find More|Find More Infos here|There you will find 28870 more Infos|Infos to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=383 […]

  6. cpnsnews.com Says:
    November 21st, 2017 at 3:26 pm

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More here|Read More|Find More Infos here|There you can find 45345 more Infos|Informations to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=383 […]

  7. coehuman Diyala Says:
    November 30th, 2017 at 2:23 pm

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More here|Read More|Read More Informations here|Here you will find 1438 more Informations|Informations to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=383 […]

  8. spa bathroom colors Says:
    December 1st, 2017 at 2:21 pm

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More on|Read More|Read More Informations here|There you will find 45122 additional Informations|Infos to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=383 […]

  9. assistência informática Says:
    December 16th, 2017 at 1:27 pm

    … [Trackback]

    […] Read More on|Read More|Read More Informations here|There you will find 48064 additional Informations|Informations to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=383 […]

Comments

You must be logged in to post a comment.