« Laws confused about laws | Main | Blind, not stupid »
The Devil’s in the detail
By Steven | April 28, 2010
How often do you check those website boxes that say “I’ve read the terms and conditions below and agree to them”?
Now, how often do you actually read the terms and conditions? Me neither.
Had we signed up to Gamestation on April Fool’s day, we would have been agreeing to this:
By placing an order via this web site on the first day of the fourth month of the year 2010 Anno Domini, you agree to grant Us a non transferable option to claim, for now and for ever more, your immortal soul.
And this:
Should We wish to exercise this option, you agree to surrender your immortal soul, and any claim you may have on it, within 5 (five) working days of receiving written notification from gamesation.co.uk or one of its duly authorised minions. We reserve the right to serve such notice in 6 (six) foot high letters of fire, however we can accept no liability for any loss or damage caused by such an act. If you a) do not believe you have an immortal soul, b) have already given it to another party, or c) do not wish to grant Us such a license, please click the link below to nullify this sub-clause and proceed with your transaction.
Nice.
Of course, nobody picked it up. It’s a beaut little demonstration of the fact that no-one bothers to read them. They’re probably still binding on us, though. Having ticked the box and all.
What about all those websites that don’t require us to expressly accept the terms and conditions, which will probably just sit under a little-clicked link headed “terms and conditions”? Are they binding on us? Perhaps not. A US court recently ruled that a manifestation of intent to consent was needed before a visitor could be held to a particular condition on the site (ie that they accept Colorado’s jurisdiction over disputes concerning the site). Question: if the particular condition (or the existence of the conditions) was sufficiently prominent, might revisiting the site later – this time, one assumes, aware of the clause – amount to consent?
Topics: Internet issues | 48 Comments »
48 Responses to “The Devil’s in the detail”
Comments
You must be logged in to post a comment.
April 28th, 2010 at 6:16 pm
I think it’s interesting that Apple update the terms and conditions of the iTunes store at least once a month, and although they give you a tick box, those T&Cs come to about 96 long pages on a little iPhone screen. I don’t think “the reasonable man” would [i]ever[/i] read all that information every few weeks so that they can access a system which is supposed to be quick and convenient.
I honestly feel like if there were a manifestly unreasonable clause hidden inside an agreement like that, the courts would find that it was misleading and deceptive conduct in trade.
May 22nd, 2020 at 11:44 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Info on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=361 […]
June 6th, 2020 at 5:03 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More here on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=361 […]
June 27th, 2020 at 6:09 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] There you will find 70991 additional Info to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=361 […]
July 10th, 2020 at 2:11 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=361 […]
July 19th, 2020 at 7:32 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More Info here to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=361 […]
July 24th, 2020 at 1:38 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=361 […]
August 4th, 2020 at 2:22 am
… [Trackback]
[…] There you can find 13285 more Information to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=361 […]
August 5th, 2020 at 12:28 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More Info here on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=361 […]
August 7th, 2020 at 3:02 am
… [Trackback]
[…] There you can find 99376 more Information to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=361 […]
October 1st, 2020 at 2:40 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More Info here to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=361 […]
October 29th, 2020 at 1:29 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More here on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=361 […]
November 5th, 2020 at 6:11 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More Info here on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=361 […]
November 7th, 2020 at 2:09 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More here on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=361 […]
November 10th, 2020 at 9:42 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More Information here to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=361 […]
November 24th, 2020 at 4:36 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More on to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=361 […]
December 20th, 2020 at 9:36 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More here on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=361 […]
January 13th, 2021 at 4:20 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=361 […]
January 23rd, 2021 at 5:12 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=361 […]
January 24th, 2021 at 3:15 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] There you will find 92042 more Information on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=361 […]
March 20th, 2021 at 8:01 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Here you can find 30198 more Info on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=361 […]
March 31st, 2021 at 9:31 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Info to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=361 […]
April 21st, 2021 at 4:28 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More on to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=361 […]
April 28th, 2021 at 11:52 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More here to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=361 […]
June 27th, 2021 at 12:26 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More Info here on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=361 […]
June 27th, 2021 at 4:53 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=361 […]
June 28th, 2021 at 8:41 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Here you will find 36234 more Information on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=361 […]
July 3rd, 2021 at 1:39 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=361 […]
July 3rd, 2021 at 5:38 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Information on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=361 […]
July 25th, 2021 at 1:07 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Information on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=361 […]
July 27th, 2021 at 6:34 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=361 […]
July 29th, 2021 at 3:05 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More on to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=361 […]
September 5th, 2021 at 6:56 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More Information here on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=361 […]
September 21st, 2021 at 11:24 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=361 […]
October 20th, 2021 at 10:53 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=361 […]
October 28th, 2021 at 11:19 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More on on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=361 […]
December 2nd, 2021 at 12:36 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=361 […]
December 19th, 2021 at 12:38 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Info on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=361 […]
January 27th, 2022 at 1:03 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Information on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=361 […]
April 6th, 2022 at 1:37 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Info to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=361 […]
April 14th, 2022 at 3:45 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More here on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=361 […]
May 6th, 2022 at 3:17 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=361 […]
May 30th, 2022 at 10:26 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=361 […]
June 9th, 2022 at 6:27 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More on to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=361 […]
June 16th, 2022 at 11:35 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Information on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=361 […]
June 18th, 2022 at 6:21 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=361 […]
June 18th, 2022 at 12:58 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Here you can find 95033 more Information to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=361 […]
June 18th, 2022 at 8:25 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Info on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=361 […]