« House of Lords supports dumping criminal libel | Main | Free speech by the numbers »
Bad English
By Steven | October 29, 2009
Let me get this straight: TVNZ7 scripted this ad? What were they thinking?
I must say, my first response was the same as Graeme Edgeler’s: this might be an “election programme” under the Broadcasting Act. It’s an offence to broadcast a promo that “advocates support for a candidate or for a political party”. Interestingly, the other types of message that are outlawed mostly specifically relate to elections, but this one doesn’t. There’s an argument that a Bill-of-Rights-consistent reading would limit this to election-time ads. There’s another argument that this is simply promoting TVNZ7. There’s another argument that English is discussing policy not seeking support for National. But these all strike me as a stretch. If this became standard fare, no-one could seriously suggest that the law wasn’t being thoroughly subverted.
To me, the first 30 seconds of this promo are indistinguishable from a political ad: scripted, flattering, underscored by music, direct-to-camera delivery, full of spin. Under s70 of the Broadcasting Act, it’s an offence to permit such broadcasts (and, under normal crimimal law, to be a party to such an offence by encouraging and facilitating it… might this include Bill English?).
Interestingly, such ads aren’t required to show balance. So it might be an offence, but you couldn’t complain that it breached broadcasting standards.
On the other hand, if it doesn’t fall under the definition of an election programme, a broadcasting standards complaint would be problematic. What do you complain about? Lack of fairness to the other parties? They’re not mentioned or referred to, so the fairness standard doesn’t apply. Balance? That merely requires the broadcast of a range of viewpoints on controversial in the period of current interest. Impartiality? Possible, but the only mention of impartiality in the current TV code comes under the accuracy standard, and only applies to news programmes.
Quite apart from the legal side, this ad (and TVNZ’s unconvincing excuses) seem to me to display remarkably bad judgment.
And quite apart from that, how exactly does it demystify the financial crisis to learn that “we can beat the Aussies… it’s time to back ourselves and apply some old-fashioned kiwi can-do… Together us kiwis can do it”?
I’m more mystified than ever.
Besides, how it is Bill English’s “plain English” if it was scripted for him? And is “plain English” really plain if it’s ungrammatical?
Topics: Broadcasting Standards Authority, Media ethics | 46 Comments »
46 Responses to “Bad English”
Comments
You must be logged in to post a comment.
October 29th, 2009 at 11:50 am
Hadn’t thought of it like that. If this is not an election programme, then there’s no prohibition on a political party paying for something like this.
I’d argue not.
There are a number of offences under the Broadcasting Act, those that occur in the election period (e.g. paying for an election programme with your own money) are committed by both the broadcaster and the advertiser. But the offences that occur outside the election period (e.g. paying for an election programme with your own money) are committed only by the broadcaster.
A sensible distinction or not, I’d argue reasonably strongly that a policy choice has been made to ping only broadcasters outside the election period, and using the normal rules of criminal responsibility to sheet home liability to parties would go against the legislative scheme.
You can draw an analogy with prostitution offences. There always has to be a second party to such offending, so the legislative decision to sheet home criminal responsibility to only one party was followed.
May 25th, 2020 at 7:04 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Here you can find 21152 more Info on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=303 […]
May 30th, 2020 at 11:12 am
… [Trackback]
[…] There you can find 56099 more Information to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=303 […]
June 12th, 2020 at 2:35 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More on on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=303 […]
July 25th, 2020 at 12:01 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Here you can find 30594 additional Information to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=303 […]
August 25th, 2020 at 7:44 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More on on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=303 […]
August 27th, 2020 at 5:55 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More here to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=303 […]
September 1st, 2020 at 8:28 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Info to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=303 […]
September 4th, 2020 at 9:27 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More on on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=303 […]
September 9th, 2020 at 1:47 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=303 […]
September 22nd, 2020 at 4:26 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=303 […]
September 24th, 2020 at 9:19 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=303 […]
September 29th, 2020 at 2:18 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=303 […]
October 5th, 2020 at 12:21 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=303 […]
November 4th, 2020 at 1:10 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=303 […]
November 5th, 2020 at 4:28 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More on to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=303 […]
November 6th, 2020 at 1:11 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Here you will find 17471 more Info on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=303 […]
November 7th, 2020 at 12:32 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] There you will find 49436 additional Info on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=303 […]
November 10th, 2020 at 2:55 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Info to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=303 […]
November 18th, 2020 at 12:11 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More on on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=303 […]
December 8th, 2020 at 1:38 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More on on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=303 […]
December 19th, 2020 at 5:06 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Info to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=303 […]
December 29th, 2020 at 2:05 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More on to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=303 […]
January 3rd, 2021 at 5:11 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Here you will find 81881 additional Information on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=303 […]
January 20th, 2021 at 6:12 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More on to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=303 […]
January 26th, 2021 at 6:51 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=303 […]
January 29th, 2021 at 9:01 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Information on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=303 […]
February 26th, 2021 at 7:43 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More here on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=303 […]
April 17th, 2021 at 1:50 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More here on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=303 […]
April 21st, 2021 at 10:24 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=303 […]
April 28th, 2021 at 10:29 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More Info here to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=303 […]
May 16th, 2021 at 3:44 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] There you can find 11725 additional Info to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=303 […]
May 23rd, 2021 at 5:27 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More Information here to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=303 […]
May 27th, 2021 at 11:25 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More Information here to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=303 […]
June 18th, 2021 at 7:54 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More on on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=303 […]
June 28th, 2021 at 7:08 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More here to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=303 […]
July 6th, 2021 at 9:33 am
… [Trackback]
[…] There you will find 88268 more Info on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=303 […]
July 16th, 2021 at 5:20 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Here you can find 54456 more Information on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=303 […]
October 2nd, 2021 at 12:35 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More Info here to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=303 […]
October 2nd, 2021 at 5:14 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Information to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=303 […]
October 2nd, 2021 at 12:07 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More Info here on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=303 […]
October 5th, 2021 at 11:49 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More on to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=303 […]
October 14th, 2021 at 11:11 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More on on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=303 […]
November 10th, 2021 at 10:55 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More Information here on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=303 […]
December 11th, 2021 at 9:06 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More Info here to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=303 […]
December 23rd, 2021 at 8:51 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More on on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=303 […]