« The case against defamation | Main | Oops? »
New High Court search rules
By Steven | June 4, 2009
There are new rules about access to court documents (including exhibits), both criminal and civil. They are more detailed and to some extent more liberal than the old ones. They open up a range of documents subject to the overriding power of a judge to seal them. Some documents, however, can only be searched with the leave of the judge, such as interviews with sex complainants and mental health patients.
There’s a welcome movement in particular toward greater openness while the matter is before the courts, when it’s most likely to be of public interest. Both sets of rules outline a (largely informal) application process, and set out the factors to be considered where leave is required. These generally reflect recent developments in the case law:
-
the right of the defendant to a fair hearing [criminal cases only, of course]:
-
the orderly and fair administration of justice:
-
the protection of confidentiality, privacy interests (including those of children and other vulnerable members of the community), and any privilege held by, or available to, any person:
-
the principle of open justice, namely, encouraging fair and accurate reporting of, and comment on, trials and decisions:
-
the freedom to seek, receive, and impart information:
-
whether a document to which the application or request relates is subject to any restriction…
-
any other matter that the Judge, other judicial officer, or Registrar thinks just.
I think these rules are a great improvement, but they don’t go as far as the Law Commission suggested.
Topics: Court records, General | 48 Comments »
48 Responses to “New High Court search rules”
Comments
You must be logged in to post a comment.
June 5th, 2009 at 7:46 pm
In the name of transparency, these are welcome changes indeed. But seemingly not practiced by the Court.
I sought to search a statement of claim in the Auckland High Court April where a wealthy businessman is suing the Crown. Even in this case, where the taxpayer is effectively being sued, I was denied access to this most rudimentary public court filing.
June 6th, 2009 at 6:40 pm
I should have noted that these new rules do not come into force until 12 June 2009.
May 24th, 2020 at 8:58 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=256 […]
May 26th, 2020 at 11:22 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More on on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=256 […]
August 6th, 2020 at 3:14 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More on to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=256 […]
August 25th, 2020 at 11:47 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More Info here on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=256 […]
August 31st, 2020 at 1:42 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More Information here to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=256 […]
September 3rd, 2020 at 3:53 am
… [Trackback]
[…] There you will find 91657 more Info to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=256 […]
September 24th, 2020 at 1:46 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=256 […]
September 28th, 2020 at 11:25 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=256 […]
September 30th, 2020 at 10:47 am
… [Trackback]
[…] There you can find 52738 additional Info to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=256 […]
October 2nd, 2020 at 4:51 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Here you can find 60344 more Info on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=256 […]
October 4th, 2020 at 1:21 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] There you can find 9074 more Info to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=256 […]
October 10th, 2020 at 4:03 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=256 […]
October 14th, 2020 at 12:34 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Information to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=256 […]
November 1st, 2020 at 11:57 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=256 […]
November 14th, 2020 at 5:36 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Information on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=256 […]
November 25th, 2020 at 7:43 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=256 […]
December 6th, 2020 at 10:53 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=256 […]
December 21st, 2020 at 4:28 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More here on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=256 […]
December 25th, 2020 at 8:24 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Info to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=256 […]
January 5th, 2021 at 1:07 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=256 […]
January 5th, 2021 at 1:18 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Info to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=256 […]
January 6th, 2021 at 3:14 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More Info here to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=256 […]
January 13th, 2021 at 12:43 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More Information here to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=256 […]
February 19th, 2021 at 10:50 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More here to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=256 […]
April 12th, 2021 at 4:59 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Info on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=256 […]
May 7th, 2021 at 12:23 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More here on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=256 […]
May 19th, 2021 at 1:03 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Information to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=256 […]
May 31st, 2021 at 8:36 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More Info here to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=256 […]
June 28th, 2021 at 2:45 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More here to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=256 […]
July 17th, 2021 at 10:35 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=256 […]
July 24th, 2021 at 8:10 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More Info here to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=256 […]
September 28th, 2021 at 7:31 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Information on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=256 […]
September 30th, 2021 at 8:12 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Here you can find 21108 more Information on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=256 […]
October 14th, 2021 at 3:07 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=256 […]
November 20th, 2021 at 11:15 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=256 […]
December 21st, 2021 at 2:06 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More Info here to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=256 […]
December 27th, 2021 at 12:50 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More Information here on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=256 […]
December 28th, 2021 at 12:38 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=256 […]
February 24th, 2022 at 7:01 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More Info here to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=256 […]
February 24th, 2022 at 10:53 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] There you can find 36238 additional Info to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=256 […]
March 10th, 2022 at 6:39 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=256 […]
March 19th, 2022 at 1:32 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More on to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=256 […]
April 4th, 2022 at 1:49 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Information on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=256 […]
April 6th, 2022 at 8:51 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Here you can find 66927 additional Information on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=256 […]
May 1st, 2022 at 12:44 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Information to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=256 […]
May 2nd, 2022 at 12:43 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Here you can find 2661 additional Information on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=256 […]