« Scotland’s Dunne v Canwest | Main | The right to receive information revived… »
NZ’s Dunne v Canwest
By Steven | May 3, 2010
Here’s a column I wrote about the Dunne case suggesting that the media’s predictions of doom and gloom were wrong.
Judging by the media reaction, Justice Young’s decision to order TV3 to include Peter Dunne and Jim Anderton in its leaders’ debate last week was one of the most astonishing blunders in judicial history.
Media Freedom Committee Chair Tim Panckhurst called it “bizarre.” The New Zealand Herald said the judge “demonstrated a cavalier disregard for fundamental issues of media freedom and private-company rights” and called his decision “astoundingly inappropriate.” Sunday Star-Times columnist Michael Laws described it as “staggeringly stupid.”
All fretted that the decision paves the way for judges to tell the media what it has to publish. “The ruling implies that every time Mr Anderton, or any other MP, expresses a view during a parliamentary debate, the media will be obliged to report it,” thundered the Herald.
This would indeed be – as Fairfax New
But it’s not.
In fact, it’s difficult to believe that any of them have even read Justice Young’s decision. If they had, they would have found its reach much more limited than they seem to imagine.
Essentially, the judge said that even though TV3 is a private company, there are occasions when companies do things that are so pivotal to our democracy that the courts may have to step in to make sure they don’t make a complete hash of them. Here, TV3 was running a debate that could conceivably affect the make-up of the next government. That possibility isn’t merely theoretical. Recent history shows how a similar debate on TVNZ (which also featured the “worm”) during the last election jump-started the fortunes of United Future. Before that debate United Future was polling at 0.4%. The worm and, afterwards, the media drooled over United Future’s leader, Peter Dunne, and the party garnered 6.9% of the vote at the election.
Even so, TV3 was going to exclude United Future from its leaders’ debate this year. It had earlier announced that only the top six parties in its July 28 poll would make the cut. ACT came in sixth, with 1.6%. United Future was next with 1.4%. Jim Anderton’s Progressive Party scored 0.4%.
Justice Young wasn’t impressed with this selection procedure. Perhaps he recalled his days as president of the Electoral Commission, the agency that divvies up public funding and airtime for party advertisements. It’s a rigorous process that weighs up everything you’d expect, including all recent poll results, existing representation in Parliament, and the results of any recent by-elections.
And here was TV3 basing its whole decision on one poll! A poll whose 3.1% margin of error made the differences between the smaller parties a statistical nonsense! Justice Young concluded that TV3 was acting “unreasonably and arbitrarily.”
The judge wrestled with the problem of who should be included in the debate. He said he would rather let TV3 re-decide itself based on proper principles. But time was running out, so he said the only sensible way to draw the line was to order the inclusion of those who, on the evidence before him, were likely to be in Parliament after the election.
The decision does have its problems. Arguably, Justice Young didn’t pay enough attention to the careful balancing that’s required under the Bill of Rights Act when freedom of expression is at stake.
Arguably, he should have acknowledged that analogous cases where the courts have intervened have involved private organisations that were performing regulatory functions, like the Advertising Standards Authority. TV3 isn’t performing that sort of public function when it holds debates.
And arguably, the judge set the standard of arbitrariness too low. There are cases that say a person’s behaviour has to be “so absurd that he must have taken leave of his senses” before the courts will treat it as “arbitrary.” TV3’s debate decision was based on a scientific poll, and was unbiased, so it wasn’t that absurd.
Bolstering this argument is Justice Young’s botched statistical reasoning. He was wrong to say that the 3.1% margin of error made the minor parties indistinguishable. What he (and the lawyers and most journalists) didn’t realise was that the margin of error shrinks when considering the smaller numbers. They’re more likely to be accurate. For instance, the margin of error for the polling of ACT (1.6%) and United Future (1.4%) is actually about plus or minus 0.8%.
That means Justice Young was right to conclude that ACT and United Future were essentially statistically indistinguishable from each other. But it also means that both are statistically distinguishable from the Progressives on 0.4%.
Ironically, on Justice Young’s reasoning, it may have been rational for TV3 to exclude Jim Anderton, but not Peter Dunne.
So there’s a fair chance that TV3 would win an appeal. But that doesn’t mean the original decision is bizarre or stupid or cavalier. In part it’s because TV3 – who only had a day to prepare its case – didn’t make the most of the available arguments.
Even if Justice Young’s decision stands, it’s very unlikely to usher in a new era of judicial management of the media. True, the door is open a chink for politicians to challenge private media decisions they think are arbitrary and that may undermine democratic rights. And under MMP, where a few votes in key electorates or a fractional shift in party support nationwide can conceivably determine who governs the country, it’s arguable that the media make many decisions that have significant electoral impact.
But Justice Young insisted such cases rarely trigger the court’s powers. His decision is tied closely to the broadcasting framework, so it’s unlikely to affect the print media. It’s hard to see it applying outside election time. Even during election season, how often will a broadcaster make such a manifestly daft editorial decision, in the context of a programme with such powerful democratic relevance?
Sure, other politicians who feel slighted by the media might be tempted to try it on in the courts. But they’re unlikely to get anywhere. For instance, the Destiny Party is now gunning for TVNZ’s Marae programme for excluding them from its scheduled candidates’ debates for Maori seats. Marae’s producer says the debates were restricted to the Labour and Maori parties, who were well ahead in the polls. They made an exception for independent candidate Mere Mangu in Te Tai Tokerau electorate as she was polling well too.
If that’s right, it seems a far cry from the sort of arbitrary media decision-making (and probably the sort of national impact) that Justice Young was talking about in the TV3 case.
Justice Young’s decision doesn’t really have “dangerous implications for a free and robust media in this country” as O’Hara and other media bigwigs contend. If there’s one thing truly guaranteed to damage the media’s role in the democratic process, it’s this sort of self-serving exaggeration from the very people we rely on to deliver accurate and impartial information.
PS. Dean Knight’s analysis of Dunne is here.
Topics: Electoral speech, NZ Bill of Rights Act | 63 Comments »
63 Responses to “NZ’s Dunne v Canwest”
Comments
You must be logged in to post a comment.
October 2nd, 2017 at 11:49 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More here|Find More|Read More Infos here|There you will find 45365 more Infos|Infos to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=364 […]
October 4th, 2017 at 3:29 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More on|Read More|Read More Infos here|Here you can find 37729 more Infos|Informations to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=364 […]
October 4th, 2017 at 3:38 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More here|Read More|Find More Informations here|There you can find 90374 more Informations|Infos on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=364 […]
October 14th, 2017 at 9:13 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More on|Read More|Read More Informations here|There you can find 35011 additional Informations|Informations to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=364 […]
November 2nd, 2017 at 6:09 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More on|Read More|Find More Informations here|Here you can find 1246 more Informations|Informations to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=364 […]
November 3rd, 2017 at 9:53 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More here|Find More|Find More Informations here|There you can find 35974 more Informations|Informations to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=364 […]
November 21st, 2017 at 2:52 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More on|Read More|Read More Informations here|Here you will find 89535 additional Informations|Informations on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=364 […]
November 30th, 2017 at 11:39 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More here|Find More|Read More Infos here|There you can find 93450 additional Infos|Infos on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=364 […]
December 1st, 2017 at 9:07 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More on|Read More|Find More Infos here|Here you can find 42908 additional Infos|Informations to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=364 […]
December 28th, 2017 at 10:17 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More on|Find More|Read More Infos here|There you can find 68176 more Infos|Informations on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=364 […]
December 31st, 2017 at 6:01 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More here|Find More|Read More Informations here|Here you can find 32214 additional Informations|Informations to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=364 […]
January 4th, 2018 at 9:12 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More here|Find More|Read More Informations here|There you can find 11845 more Informations|Infos to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=364 […]
January 10th, 2018 at 8:39 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More on|Read More|Find More Infos here|Here you can find 5089 additional Infos|Informations to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=364 […]
January 10th, 2018 at 10:57 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More here|Find More|Find More Informations here|Here you can find 90475 more Informations|Infos on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=364 […]
January 29th, 2018 at 2:18 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More here|Read More|Read More Informations here|Here you will find 61866 additional Informations|Informations on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=364 […]
February 1st, 2018 at 7:15 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More on|Read More|Find More Infos here|There you will find 32062 more Infos|Infos to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=364 […]
February 2nd, 2018 at 6:08 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More here|Read More|Find More Infos here|Here you will find 54572 additional Infos|Infos on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=364 […]
February 3rd, 2018 at 6:54 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More on|Read More|Read More Informations here|There you will find 89246 more Informations|Infos on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=364 […]
February 4th, 2018 at 7:08 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More here|Read More|Read More Infos here|There you will find 32549 additional Infos|Informations to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=364 […]
February 6th, 2018 at 10:54 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More here|Find More|Read More Infos here|There you can find 11983 additional Infos|Infos to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=364 […]
February 25th, 2018 at 5:43 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More here|Read More|Read More Infos here|Here you will find 22450 additional Infos|Infos to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=364 […]
February 25th, 2018 at 10:25 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More on|Read More|Read More Informations here|Here you can find 66464 more Informations|Informations on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=364 […]
February 27th, 2018 at 5:40 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More here|Find More|Find More Informations here|There you can find 34366 additional Informations|Informations to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=364 […]
March 13th, 2018 at 6:30 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More on|Read More|Find More Infos here|Here you will find 5328 additional Infos|Informations to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=364 […]
March 31st, 2018 at 8:03 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More on|Find More|Read More Infos here|Here you will find 63328 more Infos|Infos on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=364 […]
April 12th, 2018 at 12:19 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More on|Read More|Find More Infos here|There you will find 61786 additional Infos|Informations on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=364 […]
May 5th, 2018 at 3:54 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More on|Read More|Find More Informations here|There you will find 91980 more Informations|Infos on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=364 […]
May 12th, 2018 at 11:27 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More here|Read More|Find More Infos here|There you will find 46956 more Infos|Infos to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=364 […]
May 15th, 2018 at 10:01 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More here|Read More|Read More Infos here|There you will find 78420 additional Infos|Informations on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=364 […]
June 5th, 2018 at 9:49 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More on|Find More|Read More Infos here|Here you will find 96037 additional Infos|Informations on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=364 […]
June 6th, 2018 at 5:20 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More on|Read More|Read More Informations here|There you can find 84788 more Informations|Infos on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=364 […]
June 6th, 2018 at 12:22 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More here|Read More|Read More Infos here|Here you can find 12826 more Infos|Infos to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=364 […]
June 22nd, 2018 at 9:45 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More here|Read More|Read More Infos here|There you can find 27695 more Infos|Infos to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=364 […]
June 26th, 2018 at 11:29 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More here|Find More|Find More Infos here|Here you can find 55577 more Infos|Infos on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=364 […]
July 9th, 2018 at 4:36 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More here|Find More|Read More Informations here|There you can find 66970 more Informations|Infos on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=364 […]
July 9th, 2018 at 10:00 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More here|Find More|Find More Informations here|Here you can find 98381 more Informations|Informations on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=364 […]
July 13th, 2018 at 9:49 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More here|Find More|Read More Infos here|There you can find 79173 additional Infos|Infos on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=364 […]
July 24th, 2018 at 2:46 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More on|Read More|Read More Infos here|Here you can find 99464 more Infos|Infos on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=364 […]
July 27th, 2018 at 11:08 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More here|Read More|Find More Informations here|Here you can find 31230 more Informations|Informations to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=364 […]
August 2nd, 2018 at 11:15 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More on|Find More|Find More Infos here|Here you will find 95373 more Infos|Infos on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=364 […]
August 3rd, 2018 at 10:40 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More on|Find More|Find More Infos here|There you will find 30450 additional Infos|Informations to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=364 […]
August 9th, 2018 at 1:28 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More on|Read More|Find More Infos here|Here you can find 35504 more Infos|Infos to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=364 […]
September 25th, 2018 at 7:43 am
billiga fotbollströjor
Really beneficial, look forwards to returning.
October 10th, 2018 at 6:18 am
Billige Fodboldtrøjer
I love looking through your internet site. Appreciate it! sites:ggglese.com
December 3rd, 2018 at 2:49 am
maglie calcio a poco prezzo
z5h0c29o6 cps5zh Billige Fodboldtrøjer 0y8rnszm9 1eyxva\n tke7jw rubc2iqatk billiga fotbollströjor hb290op m7jo0pnwe\n czlhfu aqmp8bvx7 maglie calcio bambino kt5h9ic 0wd9ba5\n
December 4th, 2018 at 9:32 pm
Fodboldtrøjer
\n \n billiga fotbollströjor \n \n \n \n \n billiga fotbollströjor \n \n \n \n \n maglie calcio \n \n \n
December 6th, 2018 at 3:09 am
Billige Fodboldtrøjer Børn
\n \n Fodboldtrøjer Børn \n \n \n \n \n maglie calcio bambino \n \n \n \n \n maglie calcio poco prezzo \n \n \n
December 16th, 2018 at 8:11 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More on|Find More|Find More Infos here|Here you will find 50276 more Infos|Infos on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=364 […]
December 19th, 2018 at 11:11 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More on|Find More|Find More Informations here|There you will find 83998 more Informations|Infos on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=364 […]
January 3rd, 2019 at 8:19 pm
målvaktströja fotboll
\n \n maglie calcio a poco prezzo \n \n \n \n \n fußballtrikots kinder \n \n \n \n \n fußballtrikots \n \n \n
January 4th, 2019 at 5:35 pm
nuova maglia barcellona 2018
\n \n fotballdrakter \n \n \n \n \n fotballdrakter \n \n \n \n \n fotbollströjor barn \n \n \n
January 5th, 2019 at 1:47 pm
billige atletico madrid trøje
\n \n fotballdrakter \n \n \n \n \n fotballdrakter barn \n \n \n \n \n maglie calcio \n \n \n
January 11th, 2019 at 1:39 am
maglie calcio a poco prezzo
\n \n fodboldtrøjer børn \n \n \n \n \n fotballdrakter barn \n \n \n \n \n fußballtrikots kaufen \n \n \n
January 11th, 2019 at 4:47 pm
fotbollströjor barn
\n \n billiga fotbollströjor \n \n \n \n \n fodboldtrøjer \n \n \n \n \n fußballtrikot kinder \n \n \n
February 5th, 2019 at 7:10 am
fotbollströjor
\n \n maglie calcio \n \n \n \n \n maglie calcio \n \n \n \n \n fußballtrikots \n \n \n
February 6th, 2019 at 1:33 pm
fußballtrikot kinder
\n \n billige fotballdrakter \n \n \n \n \n billiga fotbollströjor \n \n \n \n \n fußballtrikots kaufen \n \n \n
June 8th, 2019 at 3:09 pm
Nike Air Max 2016 Femme
Nike Air Max Classic BW Mujer
June 20th, 2019 at 10:18 pm
oh really echarpe burberry marque de echarpe australie
donna scarpe da pallavolo asics tiger gel domain 3 diva blu bianca argentosito web di vendita fabbrica nike scarpe nike internationalist uomo basso squisitauomo vans authentic denim scarpe vans uomo acid denim bluconverse frange
June 22nd, 2019 at 3:49 pm
dr martens kids dr martens kids sammy infant black softy t 16205002
rain or shine the 10 best travel jackets for your next outdoorconverse chuck taylor all star ox pony hair free shipping exchangesrocks mix rug from kelatyantisocial social club assc antisocial social club hoodie xs ds
July 3rd, 2019 at 11:49 pm
arsenal football jacket new season 2018 19 online kit india ozil
kit children rompers sleepsuits nike chelsea football clubwinter outlet mens seattle seahawks nfl pro line by fanatics branded college navy neon green iconicvintage nfl dallas cowboys premium sweatshirt by mitchelouis garneau cycling clothing sale
October 8th, 2019 at 9:45 am
写械褌褋泻邪 褕械泄薪邪 褋薪械卸邪薪泻邪 屑械褌邪谢薪邪 bikespirachka
esprit czarna lekka przewiewna koszula bluzka mszlafrok wi膮zany satynowy w kwiaty koronkaprimark rajstopy z paskiem z ty艂u i napisem s msklep sportowy pi艂a koszulka nike m tee ls embrd futura m 451
October 20th, 2019 at 11:44 pm
atomic ski 140 und dalbello skischuhe
k de gadgets piedra azul collar naturaleza piedra joyer铆a bohemia50 pulseras tyvek con impresion seguridad eventos fiestapulsera bolas 3 chapas estrella florescolgante oro 18 kt. coraz贸n partido
March 20th, 2023 at 10:14 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More Infos here: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=364 […]