« New draft broadcasting code for TV | Main | OK! magazine fakes front cover photo »
ECHR upholds ongoing defamation liability for internet
By Steven | March 12, 2009
One of the rules of defamation law is that each separate publication of something that’s defamatory gives rise to separate liability. So each time someone downloads a defamatory article, there’s a fresh publication and a new potential lawsuit. You can see how this might give rise to some headaches for news archives.
However, an attempt to convince the European Court of Human Rights that this ongoing liability for archived material is a disproportionate restriction on free speech has failed. The ECHR noted that internet archives are useful and important, but indicated that they may be controlled more strictly than the initial news stories, since publication is usually more pressing when they are first published. In other words, if you’re involved in archiving, you don’t get cut as much slack as those in the more urgent business of news gathering.
Of course, many news organisations do both. This case tells them that they probably can’t just dump the stories in the archives and expect to receive the same protection that might be received for the initial publication – particularly when they are alerted to a problem with the story.
The Court said it’s not unduly onerous to expect the operators of such archives to attach a note to archived material alerting readers that it is subject to a defamation suit – this will usually be sufficient to prevent liability. The judges criticised the Times for the length of time the paper took to attach a note to the archived news story.
The court noted that the Times was sued pretty promptly for both the initial defamation in the hard copy of the paper and the later (identical) defamation-by-download, so it hadn’t been prejudiced by delay. But it added:
while an aggrieved applicant must be afforded a real opportunity to vindicate his right to reputation, libel proceedings brought against a newspaper after a significant lapse of time may well, in the absence of exceptional circumstances, give rise to a disproportionate interference with press freedom…
So there may yet be limits to ongoing liability for archives.
Topics: Defamation, Internet issues | 58 Comments »
58 Responses to “ECHR upholds ongoing defamation liability for internet”
Comments
You must be logged in to post a comment.
May 25th, 2020 at 11:06 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Info to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=227 […]
June 13th, 2020 at 3:23 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=227 […]
June 17th, 2020 at 6:37 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Information to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=227 […]
July 20th, 2020 at 12:41 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=227 […]
July 25th, 2020 at 12:16 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More here on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=227 […]
August 1st, 2020 at 11:42 am
… [Trackback]
[…] There you can find 54409 more Information to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=227 […]
September 4th, 2020 at 1:45 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Here you can find 41146 more Info to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=227 […]
September 30th, 2020 at 2:06 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More here on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=227 […]
October 3rd, 2020 at 6:44 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=227 […]
November 7th, 2020 at 2:30 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More Info here on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=227 […]
November 8th, 2020 at 6:08 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Here you can find 9659 additional Info to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=227 […]
November 8th, 2020 at 12:40 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=227 […]
November 23rd, 2020 at 12:52 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More on on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=227 […]
December 2nd, 2020 at 7:53 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More Info here to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=227 […]
December 7th, 2020 at 2:30 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More Info here to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=227 […]
December 16th, 2020 at 7:03 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More Info here to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=227 […]
December 20th, 2020 at 6:09 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] There you will find 77209 more Information on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=227 […]
December 23rd, 2020 at 12:47 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=227 […]
December 25th, 2020 at 1:45 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=227 […]
January 12th, 2021 at 3:20 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More Info here on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=227 […]
January 13th, 2021 at 3:21 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More Information here to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=227 […]
January 16th, 2021 at 7:39 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Here you can find 54331 additional Information to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=227 […]
January 22nd, 2021 at 6:30 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=227 […]
March 20th, 2021 at 8:45 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=227 […]
April 3rd, 2021 at 11:17 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More here to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=227 […]
May 11th, 2021 at 10:01 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=227 […]
May 18th, 2021 at 7:02 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=227 […]
May 19th, 2021 at 3:04 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More on on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=227 […]
May 25th, 2021 at 11:43 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More Info here to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=227 […]
June 1st, 2021 at 1:58 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=227 […]
June 8th, 2021 at 7:46 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More on on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=227 […]
June 15th, 2021 at 8:34 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More here to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=227 […]
June 26th, 2021 at 7:25 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Info to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=227 […]
June 27th, 2021 at 12:52 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More Information here on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=227 […]
July 28th, 2021 at 12:02 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More Info here on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=227 […]
August 17th, 2021 at 12:37 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More on to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=227 […]
September 8th, 2021 at 10:03 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More here on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=227 […]
September 28th, 2021 at 4:01 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More on on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=227 […]
September 30th, 2021 at 5:35 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More on on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=227 […]
December 14th, 2021 at 1:35 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=227 […]
December 21st, 2021 at 1:36 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=227 […]
December 27th, 2021 at 10:26 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=227 […]
January 9th, 2022 at 11:40 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Here you will find 44878 additional Info to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=227 […]
March 17th, 2022 at 1:22 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More Info here to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=227 […]
March 23rd, 2022 at 8:24 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Info on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=227 […]
April 6th, 2022 at 1:49 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=227 […]
April 22nd, 2022 at 12:30 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More here on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=227 […]
April 26th, 2022 at 12:38 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More Info here to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=227 […]
June 6th, 2022 at 11:43 pm
ECHR upholds ongoing defamation liability for internet | Media Law Journal
https://rad-ski-shop.de/offnungszeiten/
June 7th, 2022 at 12:01 am
ECHR upholds ongoing defamation liability for internet | Media Law Journal
https://jidousya-touroku.com/syorui/
June 7th, 2022 at 12:06 am
ECHR upholds ongoing defamation liability for internet | Media Law Journal
https://sekitarjambi.com/imbas-covid-19-pemasangan-ribuan-sambungan-pdam-tirta-mayang-tertunda/
June 7th, 2022 at 12:56 am
ECHR upholds ongoing defamation liability for internet | Media Law Journal
http://www.occubit.com/scam-emails-on-the-rise/
June 20th, 2022 at 6:35 am
ECHR upholds ongoing defamation liability for internet | Media Law Journal
https://apda.online/2014/05/07/nyu-2013-quarterfinals-swarthmore-mok-a-wak-a-v-chicago-bacon-pancakes/
August 26th, 2022 at 12:17 am
ECHR upholds ongoing defamation liability for internet | Media Law Journal
https://artboom.info/photography/winners-of-the-national-geographic-traveler-photo-contest-2012.html
October 6th, 2022 at 10:12 pm
ECHR upholds ongoing defamation liability for internet | Media Law Journal
https://invitoep.com/investment-risk-oil-and-gas-evaluations/
October 24th, 2022 at 10:34 am
ECHR upholds ongoing defamation liability for internet | Media Law Journal
http://floridasecretaryofstate.com/contact-florida-department-of-state/
November 6th, 2022 at 12:11 am
ECHR upholds ongoing defamation liability for internet | Media Law Journal
https://wall-pflegedienst.de/leistungen/
December 26th, 2022 at 12:43 am
ECHR upholds ongoing defamation liability for internet | Media Law Journal
https://consumdent.com/2017/07/05/what-parents-can-do-to-promote-good-dental-health/