« Another Bain beat-up | Main | Law Commission paper on privacy »
Police search warrants against the media
By Steven | March 3, 2009
In light of the police’s impending execution of a search warrant on the offices of the Herald on Sunday over Holmes’s (apparently) recorded interview with Tony Veitch, I thought y’all might be interested in the Court of Appeal’s guidelines for the issue of such warrants (from TVNZ v Attorney-General [1995] 2 NZLR 641):
One guideline, in a case where there is no suggestion that the media organisation has committed any offence and it has done no more than record events which may include the commission of offences by others, is that the intrusive procedure of a search warrant should not be used for trivial or truly minor cases. [The Court felt that protesters overcoming naval personnel to replace the flag at Waitangi treaty grounds was sufficiently serious, particularly as they were “calculated insults to the constitution of New Zealand”].
…
A second guideline is that, as far as practicable, a warrant should not be granted or executed so as to impair the public dissemination of news… in the present case the company appears to have already broadcast what it wanted from the tapes in its news programmes.
…
A third guideline is that only in exceptional circumstances where it is truly essential in the interests of justice should a warrant be granted or executed if there is a substantial risk that it will result in the “drying-up” of confidential sources of information for the media. In this case again there appears to be no risk of that kind. The tapes simply recorded public events.
A fourth guideline is that a warrant should be executed considerately and so as to cause the least practicable disruption to the business of the media organisation. In this instance, had the appellant so wished it might have been possible for the police to view the tapes at the studio and to take away only those found to be of significant evidential value…
A fifth guideline for the grant of a warrant relates to the relative importance of the tapes for the purposes of a prosecution. [A warrant may be issued] “when it is likely that the film will have a direct and important place in the determination of the issues before the Court.” It must be remembered that the evidential value of tapes may because of their accuracy exceed that of accounts by eye witnesses. In a confused situation involving the actions of many members of a crowd the … recording may be fairer to all concerned than eyewitness evidence. While the availability of other evidence is a factor for consideration, the superior reliability of a film will often outweigh it.
Can we be forgiven for wondering how helpful Holmes’s tape is likely be, especially given how long the police seem to have waited to make this application. Besides, would Veitch and Holmes have really allowed anything incriminating to be on that tape?
Topics: Journalism and criminal law, Search warrants | 48 Comments »
48 Responses to “Police search warrants against the media”
Comments
You must be logged in to post a comment.
November 17th, 2011 at 7:17 pm
[…] Price points to a post that he did on the case law on search warrants for media based on a 1995 case that laid out the […]
June 3rd, 2020 at 12:15 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More here to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=224 […]
June 17th, 2020 at 6:48 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More Info here to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=224 […]
June 23rd, 2020 at 1:29 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Here you can find 73023 additional Info to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=224 […]
June 25th, 2020 at 11:38 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More here to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=224 […]
July 27th, 2020 at 5:30 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Here you can find 80097 additional Information on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=224 […]
August 18th, 2020 at 4:49 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=224 […]
August 29th, 2020 at 3:00 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More Info here to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=224 […]
August 30th, 2020 at 8:26 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More on to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=224 […]
September 4th, 2020 at 2:23 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=224 […]
September 10th, 2020 at 1:02 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More Info here on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=224 […]
September 19th, 2020 at 9:33 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More Information here to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=224 […]
September 22nd, 2020 at 8:08 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More Information here on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=224 […]
October 2nd, 2020 at 2:29 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=224 […]
October 6th, 2020 at 8:52 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Info on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=224 […]
November 6th, 2020 at 1:02 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Info on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=224 […]
November 6th, 2020 at 1:40 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More here to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=224 […]
November 7th, 2020 at 1:31 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Here you will find 32644 additional Information on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=224 […]
November 13th, 2020 at 1:10 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More Info here to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=224 […]
November 19th, 2020 at 9:33 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More here on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=224 […]
December 8th, 2020 at 1:04 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More on on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=224 […]
December 20th, 2020 at 7:28 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More Info here to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=224 […]
January 7th, 2021 at 3:33 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=224 […]
January 9th, 2021 at 8:37 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Info on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=224 […]
January 13th, 2021 at 5:08 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] There you can find 28395 additional Information on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=224 […]
January 16th, 2021 at 3:25 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] There you will find 96740 more Information on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=224 […]
January 22nd, 2021 at 12:04 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Info on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=224 […]
February 11th, 2021 at 4:29 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=224 […]
February 13th, 2021 at 12:40 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Info to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=224 […]
February 16th, 2021 at 3:12 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More here to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=224 […]
April 8th, 2021 at 10:38 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=224 […]
April 25th, 2021 at 4:07 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More Information here on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=224 […]
May 9th, 2021 at 1:10 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More Information here to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=224 […]
May 11th, 2021 at 6:54 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More on on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=224 […]
June 27th, 2021 at 6:26 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] There you will find 31324 more Info to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=224 […]
July 3rd, 2021 at 11:35 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More Info here to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=224 […]
July 27th, 2021 at 12:31 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=224 […]
August 31st, 2021 at 11:27 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Information to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=224 […]
September 3rd, 2021 at 11:44 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Information on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=224 […]
October 6th, 2021 at 3:31 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More Info here on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=224 […]
November 11th, 2021 at 12:34 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=224 […]
December 14th, 2021 at 1:50 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Here you will find 8513 more Information to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=224 […]
December 15th, 2021 at 5:08 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More Information here on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=224 […]
February 26th, 2022 at 3:15 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More Information here to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=224 […]
April 24th, 2022 at 2:42 am
… [Trackback]
[…] There you will find 23485 additional Information on that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=224 […]
May 16th, 2022 at 12:00 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] There you will find 55834 additional Information to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=224 […]
May 30th, 2022 at 11:33 pm
… [Trackback]
[…] Read More on to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=224 […]
June 18th, 2022 at 5:42 am
… [Trackback]
[…] Find More Info here to that Topic: medialawjournal.co.nz/?p=224 […]